Jordan: Enhancing Protection and Justice for Vulnerable Children and Youth in Jordan

Terms of Reference: 

Consultancy Title: Final Evaluation

Project Title: Enhancing Protection and Justice for Vulnerable Children and Youth in Jordan

Location: Irbid, Karak, Amman, Madaba, Balqa, Zarqa, including Azraq Camp, Training and Rehabilitation Centres (for juvenile offenders) and Protection Centres (for girls and women at risk of or survivors of GBV), and host communities

Duration: September 15, 2025 to December 31, 2025

Duration: 76 working days

Presentation of Terre des hommes: 

Created in 1960, the Foundation of Terre des Hommes Lausanne (Tdh-L) mission is to come to the aid of children in need. It endeavours at all times to defend the rights of children, in times of war and natural disasters, or in less publicized situations of distress, regardless of their race, creed or political affiliation. Today, Terre des Hommes Foundation is the largest Non-Governmental Organization (NGO) for children’s aid in Switzerland. Besides, Tdh has development projects and emergency relief programs in more than 45 countries, including Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt and Syria. Tdh develops and implements field projects to allow a better daily life for over three million children and their relatives, particularly in the domains of health care, access to justice, and children and youth on the move. This engagement is financed by individual and institutional donations. Over the last fifty years, Terre des Hommes foundation has developed in two core areas: healthcare and child protection. Every year, Tdh-L offers sustainable solutions and a better future for over one million children and their relatives by focusing on two levels:

• Providing direct aid worldwide for children in need, whereby projects are carried out under our own management or in partnership with local organizations.
• As an ambassador for children’s rights in Switzerland and throughout the world, through campaigns that promote the fundamental rights of children or that denounce violation of these rights, those contained in the Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted by the United Nations (UN) in 1989.

Tdh Jordan was established in 2007 in response to the Iraqi refugee crisis. Since then, the Migration Program has evolved into responding to various emergencies that have afflicted the country at different periods in time, including the Syrian refugee crisis. In 2013 the organization established an Access to Justice program, focused on protecting the rights of children in conflict with the law aiming to orient the justice stakeholders towards a more child friendly and protective juvenile system. Currently the Tdh-L works with the Syrian refugees in the Azraq Camp), urban Syrian refugees and vulnerable host communities through several child focused interventions, covering geographical areas of Amman, Zarqa, Irbid, Karak, Madaba, and Balqa.

PRESENTATION OF THE PROJECT: 

Beneficiaries: 

• Girls, boys, women, men and youth (both young men and young women) exposed to or at risk of protection violations (direct)
• Service providers, family and community members, formal and informal actors (indirect)

Total Direct Beneficiaries: 14,920

Total Indirect Beneficiaries: 28,550

Partners: Amman: Yarob, Irbid: Idoun, Karak: Nadi AlEbda, Zarqa: Athar, Balqa: Shabab AlWadi, Madaba: Hamseh [1]

Objective: The most vulnerable children and youth from refugee and host communities in Jordan live in a safe, protective environment and enjoy their rights.

Expected Outcomes: 

• Improved access to quality preventative and responsive protection and justice services
• Increased adoption of inclusive and protective social norms
• Strengthened protection and justice systems

Objective of the Evaluation: 

The overall objective of the final evaluation is to assess the relevancy, coherent, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability of the project over its entire implementation period. It aims to generate evidence-based insights to inform the closure of the project, provide accountability to stakeholders (including the donor SDC and partners), and contribute to learning for future programming.

Given the sensitive nature of the project’s components, especially those related to Gender-Based Violence (GBV) and child protection, the evaluation will place particular emphasis on how these issues were addressed, sustained, and handed over to partners. The evaluation will examine whether partners involved in the exit strategy adhere to international legal frameworks, humanitarian standards, and minimum operational standards on GBV, women’s rights, and child rights. It will also identify any gaps, risks, or challenges in this handover process and recommend mitigating measures and follow-up actions to promote and safeguard these standards beyond Tdh’s direct involvement.

Recognizing that protection is a cross-cutting and critical area of intervention, the evaluation will explicitly assess the project’s approach to GBV and gender-sensitive programming, including:

• The effectiveness of protection mechanisms within project activities.
• The inclusion and empowerment of women and girls as specific focus groups.
• The extent to which gender considerations were mainstreamed throughout project design and implementation.
• The capacity and standards of partners to uphold protection principles aligned with international frameworks.

Specific Objectives:

• To assess the extent to which the project has achieved its intended outcomes and contributed to addressing the needs of the target population, with particular attention to women, girls, and other vulnerable groups.
• To evaluate the effectiveness, and sustainability of the project’s strategies, including the partnership model employed by Tdh and its contribution to achieving results, , and how well gender and protection considerations were integrated.
• To assess the sustainability of project outcomes and the potential for continued impact and action after Tdh’s exit, including the capacity of partners, adherence to GBV and child protection standards, and community structures to sustain interventions.
• To analyze the exit strategy, particularly the handover process for sensitive components such as GBV services and child protection centers, including an assessment of partners’ compliance with international protection standards and recommended follow-up or mitigation measures.
• To identify key lessons learned, best practices, and challenges encountered during the project’s implementation, with a focus on protection, gender mainstreaming, and partnership dynamics, providing actionable recommendations for Tdh, partners, and stakeholders for future programming and similar interventions.
• To review the project’s adaptability and responsiveness to evolving needs, risks, and contextual changes throughout the project cycle, including how protection and gender issues were addressed throughout the project cycle.

The evaluation will be guided by the OECD-DAC criteria for humanitarian action (relevance, coherence, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, and sustainability), along with Tdh’s Project Cycle Management Guidelines and relevant international frameworks on GBV, women’s rights, and child protection. It will provide a comprehensive, critical, and evidence-based analysis of the project’s achievements and challenges, with in-depth evaluation and analysis focusing primarily on effectiveness, impact, and sustainability. While relevance, efficiency, and coherence will be considered, they will be addressed more generally at the program level and not examined in detail for each individual intervention.

Scope of Work: 

The final evaluation will cover the following areas:

Preparation Phase: 

• Desk review for the main documents of the project, including but not limited to technical assessments and studies, baseline assessment, mid-term evaluation, Performance Indicator Reference Sheet, work plan, donor’s reports, MEL reports, and learning briefs.
• An initial orientation meeting with Tdh project staff, technical leads, and relevant stakeholders to clarify the evaluation scope and expectations, gain in-depth understanding of project objectives, strategies, and interventions, and discuss contextual factors, key challenges, and project dynamics.
• Conducting up to 10 interviews with technical team, partners, and the donor to better understand the interventions.
• Development of data collection tools for surveys, FGDs, and interviews, tailored to capture nuanced data relevant to the indicators and objectives.
• Finalization of the methodology, including sampling techniques and data collection protocols.
• Sharing the inception report for the whole assignment, which covers the summary of desk review, sampling design and framework, primary data collection tools, data analysis and presentation, quality assurance and control procedures, and ethical considerations.

The proposed structure of the inception report:

• Introduction
• Evaluation Objectives
• Literature Review
• Methodology
• Approaches and Theories
• Data Collection Methods
• Sampling
• Data Analysis
• Ethical Considerations
• Limitations
• Tools and Guidelines
• Informed Consent
• Data Collection Tools and Guidelines (In Arabic and English).
• Questions Matrix (to align questions with methods and sources)
• Work Plan and Timeline
• Project Milestones
• Data Collection Plan and Overall Timeline
• Roles and Responsibilities
• Evaluation Team Members
• Assigned Responsibilities
• Risk Management
• Potential Risks
• Mitigation Strategies
• Quality Assurance
• References.
• Solicit and reflect the feedback of Tdh’s reference group to the data collection tools and inception report.
• Conduct a comprehensive training for the data collection team—enumerators, facilitators, and supervisors on the following aspects:
• Use of Data Collection Tools: Ensure team members are fully familiar with the survey questionnaires, FGD guides, and KII protocols, including question intent, skip patterns, and coding formats.
• Data Collection Methodology: Equip the team with skills to apply quantitative and qualitative methods effectively, including interviewing techniques, probing skills, and facilitating inclusive discussions.
• Ethical Standards: Reinforce principles of informed consent, confidentiality, safeguarding (especially for children and vulnerable populations), and the handling of sensitive data.
• Quality Assurance Protocols: Train the team on ensuring data accuracy, minimizing biases, and following quality control procedures such as back-checking and supervisor reviews.
• Cultural Sensitivity and Community Engagement: Provide guidance on respectful engagement with participants, handling difficult situations, and adapting communication approaches to local norms and languages.
• Overview of Tdh and SDC Interventions.

Data Collection Phase: 

• Conduct pre-testing (pilot) of all data collection tools—including surveys, Focus Group Discussion (FGD) guides, and Key Informant Interview (KII) protocols to ensure 1) clarity and relevance of questions, 2) comprehensiveness in capturing the necessary data aligned with project objectives and indicators, and 3) Cultural sensitivity and appropriateness for the target population.
• Data collection will be conducted using a mixed-methods approach (quantitative and qualitative) to ensure comprehensive and nuanced insights. This will include:
• Surveys with project beneficiaries and stakeholders.
• Focus Group Discussions (FGDs) to gather participants’ perspectives, with careful facilitation to ensure inclusivity.
• Semi-structured interviews with technical teams, partners, and participants.
• Case studies.
• All data collection activities will strictly adhere to ethical guidelines and standards, including:
• Informed consent processes.
• Protection of confidentiality and privacy of respondents
• Ensuring the safety, dignity, and well-being of all participants, with specific attention to vulnerable groups (e.g., children, women, and persons with disabilities)
• Adherence to child safeguarding and protection policies.

To ensure the validity and reliability of data:

• Consultancy team will monitor data collection processes regularly.
• Spot checks and back-checks will be conducted to verify accuracy.
• Data will be reviewed daily for consistency, completeness, and potential errors.
• Enumerators and facilitators will receive thorough training on tools, techniques, and ethical considerations before field deployment.

The evaluation team will provide weekly progress reports via email on data collection activities, including:

• Number of surveys/FGDs/KIIs completed
• Field observations and emerging challenges
• Quality assurance issues highlighting data quality issues and mitigation actions
• For FGDs, the consultant is responsible for covering the transportation fees (3 JOD per participant) and refreshments (1 JOD per participant) from their own budget as part of the financial proposal. The estimated budget for these FGD-related expenses ranges from 1,500 to 2,000 JOD, depending on the number of participants.

Analysis and Reporting Phase: 

• A thorough analysis of data to extract meaningful insights regarding achievements, challenges, and impacts according to the intended objectives of interventions and overarching results.
• Convene a validation workshop in order to present and validate the findings drawn from the analysis.
• Development of a comprehensive report documenting findings, analyses, lessons learned, best practices, and actionable recommendations.
• Presentation of findings to relevant stakeholders.
• Incorporating feedback from stakeholders into the final report to ensure accuracy and relevance.

The proposed structure of the evaluation report:

• Executive Summary focused on findings and recommendations [maximum 3 pages].
• Overview of the context and program background.
• Methodology, including methods, selection and sampling methods, constraints and challenges encountered, and strategies used to overcome them.
• Detailed key findings presented per evaluation criteria or activity.
• Best practices.
• Lessons Learned.
• Recommandations.
• Conclusion.
• Case Studies.
• Annexes.
• The executive summary should be provided in both English and Arabic and attached as an annex to the final report.

Please note that Tdh usually requests three to four rounds of revisions for the draft inception report and the final evaluation report, depending on the quality of the submitted drafts. Kindly take this into account when preparing your workplan. Additional revisions may be required if necessary.

Methodology:

The final evaluation will employ a robust mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative surveys with qualitative data collection techniques such as interviews, case studies, and focus group discussions. Sampling techniques will be designed to ensure the representation of diverse stakeholders, geographical locations and aggregations based on gender, age, disability status, and nationality.

Sampling Design and Framework: 

The sample should be statistically representative and randomly selected; it should be stratified in a way that serves the achievement of evaluation objectives, answering evaluation questions, measuring the identified data points, and applying the relevant standards and technical aspects. Tdh expects to use stratified sampling for the survey, and the purposive and quota sampling techniques for the qualitative methods.

The final and more detailed sampling plan should be developed during the inception phase based on the preliminary consultations and desk review. Therefore, to be submitted as part of the inception report for the approval of the reference group, noting that the consultancy firm might be required to reach all populations of certain activities to measure certain indicators as required by the pre-identified measurement methods identified by the contractual key performance indicators of the project. At the end of the evaluation process, the final sampling framework and respondents list should be submitted to Tdh.

The sample size for the survey will be determined at the inception stage. For part of the indicators, all targeted participants under these indicators should be reached by the evaluation. However, most of the targeted businesses under the rest of the indicators will be reached by the evaluation using a sampling approach. In all cases, the roughly estimated final sample size for this annual survey is 1500 respondents. A 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error are suitable for other interventions.

Regarding qualitative methods, the sample size for FGDs and interviews will be determined during the inception stage to ensure reaching saturation level. Various selection criteria will determine the sample size. Additionally, the sample size mentioned in the inception report will be considered a minimum, with the consultancy team expected to conduct additional data collection if the saturation level is not reached.

The evaluation will engage a diverse group of respondents, including stakeholders from both refugee and host communities, as follows:

• Children (girls and boys).
• Youth.
• Families/Caregivers.
• Community members.
• Partners (e.g., NGOs, CBOs, and other implementing actors).
• Formal justice and governmental actors (e.g., representatives from juvenile justice systems, ministries, and relevant public institutions).
• The list of participants that will be reached through the quantitative and qualitative data collection will be provided by Tdh to the consultant.

Primary Data Collection: 

• The primary data collection includes the collection of both quantitative data through surveys and qualitative data (FGDs and semi-structured interviews).
• The quantitative data should be collected through phone calls and using Smap platform. Smap is a data collection tool for Tdh surveys.

The following considerations must be taken into account by the consultancy firm in collaboration:

• Tdh will grant necessary permissions on Smap to the consultancy firm.
• Upon receiving the final Word version of the survey, Tdh will transform it on Smap.
• Questions will be incorporated in both Arabic and English, fully translated, including skip logic and constraints.
• The final version of the tool be tested and piloted by the consultant before starting the data collection.
• Quantitative data should be collected by well-trained enumerators. The data collection team should be trained on ethical considerations, including child protection principles, safe garden practices, and the process for obtaining informed consent through properly administered consent forms.
• The team must also be trained on the referral procedures for any complaints to the MEAL department.
• The collected data should be subjected to regular quality checks by the consultant team.
• The consultant should ensure that phone-based surveys are conducted by data collectors of the same sex as the respondents.

The Qualitative Data Collection: 

• The FGDs should be facilitated by two gender-sensitive facilitators and should be designed to cover inclusively, and in the best thematic and inclusive way that can measure the initially identified data points explicitly and cross-cutting themes and technical considerations.
• The FGDs are expected to target the project’s participants (8-12 participants in each FGD), and the semi-structured interviews are expected to be mostly with partners, facilitators, trainers, other stakeholders. The detailed design, selection criteria, and processes of facilitating the qualitative data should be included in the technical proposal of applicants.
• The minimum estimated number of FGDs for the evaluation is 40 FGDs. At least 80% of the FGDs should be conducted in person while 20% could be done online. The consultancy company must outline a detailed plan in the inception report, justifying the choice of modality for each FGD based on the interventions and characteristics of the targeted groups.
• If an FGD has fewer than six participants, it should be replaced with extra FGDs at no additional cost and without extending the milestone's timeframe. Also, the consultancy company should develop a quality checklist for the FGDs and interviews to be included in the inception report. Tdh reserves the right to request additional FGDs and interviews if any of the conducted FGDs and interviews do not meet the quality standards outlined in the approved checklist.
• A minimum of 30 semi-structured interviews is required, excluding those already conducted with Tdh’s technical leads, CBOs, and SDC during the inception phase. This is to ensure the consultant develops a comprehensive understanding of Tdh’s interventions, the contextual environment, the logical framework, and the terminology used. Tdh remains flexible regarding the interview modality, which may be conducted online, in person, or through a combination of both.
• The consultant will be responsible for managing all of the logistical issues to conduct the FGDs and interviews; this includes but is not limited to, contacting and inviting the potential participants, booking and renting the venues (if required), documenting the participants’ lists, and taking the required consent forms signed by the participants. The consultancy firm will be in charge of inviting the targeted stakeholders to participate in FGDs and interviews.
• The consultancy company should intentionally plan their data collection strategy in a way appropriate for the targeted participants and stakeholders. For example, for specific interventions with particular target groups, it would be more suitable to conduct FGDs or interviews on weekends or after official working hours. Intentional flexibility with sound rationale is expected from the consultant.
• Furthermore, the consultant should select and interview four case studies. The themes of these case studies should be identified by the consultant during the inception stage and in consultation with Tdh team. The case studies should highlight the multi-dimensional behavioral and social factors from the perspective of participants. Likewise, it should cover the agency, relationship, and structural aspects if applicable, and should be structured and thorough enough to show the in-depth aspects of concerns.

Data Analysis and Presentation: 

• The qualitative data analysis can be done using MAXQDA to the specific methodology proposed by the consultant. Tdh should be granted access to the qualitative data throughout the research process and should be submitted at the end of the assessment. The primary source of quantitative data will be Tdh Smap system. The final data analysis approach should be further elaborated in the inception phase.
• In terms of qualitative analysis, the consultant is required to provide complete transcriptions for FGDs and interviews. The qualitative analysis utilizing MaxQDA should encompass categorizations, coding, and labeling, across a minimum of 5 levels in order to provide a detailed and in-depth analysis of the data. This will allow for a deeper understanding of the themes, patterns, and connections within the data, ultimately leading to more insightful and meaningful conclusions.

Presentation and Validation of the Initial Findings: 

• At the end of the data collection and analysis phase, the consultant should present the findings for discussion and validation with Tdh team as well. The consultant should revise the draft findings report based on the revision of Tdh’s reference group members, and the outcomes of the validation workshop. Therefore, submit the draft report for the findings to Tdh for revision and approval.
• The PowerPoint presentation should be submitted in English and Arabic.

Intended users of the evaluation: 

• This final evaluation primarily serves as a learning and accountability tool for Tdh to assess project performance, capture and document achievements, and identify areas for improvement. The findings will support Tdh’s internal decision-making, strengthen program design, and enhance future programming approaches. Additionally, the evaluation results will be incorporated into SDC’s final annual report to provide a comprehensive overview of project outcomes and impact.
• Key users of the evaluation include the project donor (SDC), implementing staff, and partners, who will use the evaluation results to inform decision making and strategic planning. Additionally, the evaluation will contribute to knowledge sharing within the humanitarian sector, promoting best practices and lessons learned.

In particular, the evaluation will contribute to:

• Supporting the institutionalization of juvenile services within national systems, by identifying effective models, documenting good practices, and offering recommendations to inform national policies and service delivery frameworks.
• Highlighting opportunities for advocacy and policy reform, leveraging evidence on project outcomes and lessons learned to engage with decision-makers and promote stronger protective environments for children.
• Exploring innovative financing models and sustainability strategies, especially in relation to the work delivered through LNGOs, to assess how alternative funding approaches could strengthen impact and ensure continuity beyond the life of the project.
• Facilitating knowledge sharing within the humanitarian and development sector, promoting best practices, and encouraging collaboration with peer organizations and institutional stakeholders.
• The evaluation is also intended to serve as a reference for donors, policy actors, and implementing partners seeking to advance child protection, juvenile justice, and social protection systems in Jordan.

Deliverables of the Assignment: 
#

Deliverable

Tasks

LoE

(no. of days)

1

Final inception

Report

Task 1.1 – desk review

3

Task 1.2 – orientation meeting and familiarization interviews

3

Task 1.3 – design and refine research tools

3

Task 1.4 – prepare, finalize, and deliver the inception report

4

2

Raw data

Task 2.1 – training of enumerators

2

Task 2.2 – survey data collection

10

Task 2.3 – conducting FGDs

10

Task 2.4 – conducting semi-structured interviews

5

Task 2.5 - conducting case studies

2

Task 2.6 - Submit signed informed consent forms and a complete list of participants for FGDs and interviews.

3

Qualitative analysis for FGDs and interviews

Task 3.1 writing full transcriptions

5

Task 3.2 develop coding structure

2

Task 1.5 task 3.2 – qualitative data analysis

5

4

Quantitative data analysis

Task 4.1 quantitative data analysis

5

5

Final full report

Task 5.1 – report writing

5

Task 5.2 conducting validation workshop

2

Task 5.3 – report review and finalization

10

Important Notes:

• The contractor’s methodology must comply with the requirements and deliverables mentioned in the Scope of Work (SOW), noting that the SOW will be our first reference in case of any discrepancies.
• Changing any of the team members mentioned in the contractor’s application is subject to Tdh’s technical team confirmation and approval.
• Tdh’s requests for revising, editing, and improving the quality of any deliverables or submittals shall not affect any of the deliverable prices.
• Tdh’ obligation is to pay the fixed price for each deliverable regardless of the level of effort provided by the Contractor to complete it.
• The LOEs in the above table are indicative only to show the estimated time needed to complete each task/deliverable, and they are not used as the basis for pricing. If a certain deliverable consumes more or less than its LOE specified in the table, pricing should not be affected.
• All above prices include direct and indirect costs that are necessary to complete the entire service.
• Tdh will not separately cover any expenses related (but not limited) to; transportation, training logistics, equipment and software needed to complete the service.

Ownership: 

Tdh requires that all efforts from consultants/contractors including connections, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) data, recordings, transcriptions, reports, secondary resources, tools, presentations, datasets, photos, and templates that were developed during any assignment shall remain the property of Tdh only and shall be treated in confidentiality and not to be shared with any third parties. That also applies to all documents shared from Tdh side with the consultant/contractor such as the proposal, baseline assessment, mid-term evaluation, and any other project documentation.

Ethical Considerations: 

Tdh is committed to ensuring that all individuals we come into contact with through our work, whether team members, partners, community members, participants, or others, are treated with respect and dignity. We are committed to the core principles regarding the prevention of sexual exploitation and abuse laid out by the UN Secretary-General and IASC. We will not tolerate child abuse, sexual exploitation, abuse, or harassment by or of our team members.

As part of Tdh’s commitments to the Core Humanitarian Standards for Quality and Accountability and to provide services with respect and protection to human rights, Tdh applies multiple policies to prevent and mitigate improper incidents. The selected candidate shall sign and adhere to the Tdh policies, such as safeguarding, antifraud, conflict of interest, and anti-corruption.

Profile of the Consultant/Team: 

The consultant must be a national expert with extensive experience in in the design, implementation, and evaluation of humanitarian projects. The ideal profile includes:

Essential Qualifications and Experience:

• Proven track record in conducting humanitarian evaluations using a range of methodologies, including:
  • Qualitative techniques: in-depth analysis methods, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, and participatory approaches.
  • Quantitative techniques: descriptive and inferential statistical analysis.
• Strong analytical skills, with the ability to triangulate qualitative and quantitative data to generate robust and actionable insights.
• Extensive experience working in the Middle East humanitarian and development sector, with direct experience in Jordan considered a strong asset.
• Demonstrated knowledge and expertise in child protection within both refugee and host community contexts, particularly in areas such as:
  • Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Services (MHPSS)
    Advocacy, gender, juvenile justice, and capacity building.
  • Partnership.
• Deep understanding of project cycle management (PCM) principles and practices, including monitoring and evaluation frameworks.
• Experience in implementing and/or evaluating community-based approaches and capacity-building projects.

Additional Skills and Attributes:

• Strong conceptual and analytical thinking abilities, with demonstrated experience in conducting in-depth qualitative analyses.
• Excellent communication, facilitation, and report writing skills in both Arabic and English.
• Proven ability to work effectively in an intercultural environment and engage with diverse stakeholders, including community members, local authorities, and technical teams.
• A gender-balanced team composition is preferred when applying as a team of consultants.
• Previous experience in evaluating or implementing SDC-funded projects is considered an asset.

Budget: 

The consultant is required to mention in its application a daily rate in CHF, based on a total amount of 76 days required to carry out the consultancy. All other costs related to the consultancy (logistical support) will be covered by Tdh. The payment will be issued in two parts:

• 30% upon submission of approved inception report.
• 70% upon acceptance of the final report.

Application Procedures: 

To be considered, interested and qualified consultant/team must submit the following documentation:

• Curriculum Vitae (CV): A maximum of 3–4 pages per team member, highlighting relevant work experience, technical expertise, and qualifications pertinent to this evaluation.
• Cover Letter: A signed cover letter, no longer than 1–2 pages, clearly stating:
  • The applicant’s motivation for applying.
  • Their relevant experience and expertise for this consultancy.
  • A clear statement of availability to undertake the assignment within the proposed timeline.
• References: Full contact details (name, position, email, and phone number) of at least three recent clients who can provide references regarding the applicant’s work quality, reliability, and expertise in similar assignments.
• Sample Reports: Three relevant sample reports from previous evaluations or consultancies that demonstrate the applicant’s experience and capacity to deliver high-quality work aligned with the objectives of this consultancy.
• Technical Offer: A detailed technical offer that includes:
• Understanding of the Assignment: A brief description of how the applicant has understood the objectives of the consultancy and the ToR.
• Methodology and Approach: A clearly outlined methodology, including:
  • Evaluation approaches.
  • The proposed data collection methods (qualitative and quantitative)
  • Sampling approach (method, unit, and size)
  • Draft evaluation matrix/tools tailored to the project context and objectives.
  • Analysis.
  • Ethical considerations.
• Work Plan/Chronogram: A detailed timeline outlining the key phases of the evaluation, including specific roles and responsibilities for the consultant(s) and team members at each stage.
• Financial offer: The financial offer should present a detailed budget for the consultancy. It must:
  • Outline all expected costs, including consultancy fees, data collection costs (enumerators, transportation, per diems), logistical support, transcription and translation services, analysis, and report writing.
  • Include a clear breakdown of costs per deliverable.
  • Be presented in CHF, with all applicable taxes and fees clearly indicated.
  • Provide a total lump sum amount for the entire consultancy.

How to Apply: 

Interested candidates should send the Technical & Financial Proposal separately before 18/8/2025 to Jor.tenders@tdh.org with the title: Mid-term evaluation.

Only applicants submitting complete applications and under serious consideration will be contacted.

[1] There are no partners in the Emirati Jordanian Camp