
Led By: World Vision
Contact us at: ame.wg@alliancecpha.org
Our Mission
The AME (Assessment, Measurement, and Evidence) Working Group exists to empower child protection practitioners with the tools, evidence, and skills needed to improve outcomes for children in humanitarian settings. We focus on promoting evidence-informed decision-making, fostering collaboration, and building capacity to integrate data and insights into program design and implementation.
Key Priorities of the AME Working Group
- Developing and Sharing Tools: We create, review, and disseminate tools and methods to help practitioners assess and monitor child protection programs effectively.
- Generating and Promoting Evidence: We synthesise, analyse, and share evidence to inform and improve child protection in humanitarian settings.
- Building Capacity: We provide training, guidance, and resources to enhance the skills of practitioners and organisations in using evidence and assessment tools.
- Collaborating Across Groups: We support other Working Groups and Task Forces in advancing their work through evidence-based approaches, including developing shared methodologies and frameworks.
Latest News
New Survey: How Are Funding Cuts Affecting Children’s Protection?
New Briefing Note! Global Impact of Humanitarian Funding Cuts on Children’s Protection
Working Group Member Organisations
Key Tools
Brief | Global Impact of Funding Cuts on Children and their Protection in Humanitarian Contexts
Children have the right to be protected from abuse, neglect, exploitation, and violence. Yet, in humanitarian crises children suffer first and most, with devastating consequences for their immediate safety and long-term well-being. The humanitarian system is under unprecedented strain. Major donors, including the US and key European governments, have drastically reduced humanitarian funding or
Guidance Note | Resources for Conducting Ethical Research with Children in Humanitarian Contexts
This Resource List catalogues critical resources to guide ethical good practices in participatory research with children in humanitarian contexts. It is not an exhaustive compilation, nor does it propose new ethical guidelines. Instead, it highlights existing tools that help researchers and practitioners understand, utilise, and apply well-established ethical principles.
These resources are
Enhanced CPMS Indicators Table
An easy-to-navigate PDF, the Enhanced CPMS Indicators Table includes the 28 Child Protection Minimum Standards and their indicators with type, target values and explanatory notes plus suggested computation methods and data source examples. Developed by the Assessment, Measurement and Evidence Working Group, this tool is part of the measurement framework of the CPMS 2019 edition.
Resources
Guidance Note | Qualitative Assessment Approaches for the Protection of Children with Disabilities Within Humanitarian Contexts
Guidance | A Brief Guide: Selecting Child Protection Minimum Standards Indicators for Application in Programs, Projects or Humanitarian Response Plans
Position Paper | Defining Evidence-Based Practice for Application in Child Protection in Humanitarian Action
Evidence Brief | Why Identifying Risk and Protective Factors is a Critical Step in Prevention Programming: Implications for Child Protection in Humanitarian Action
Guidance | Identifying and Ranking Risk and Protective Factors: A Brief Guide
Contextualizing and Measuring Child Well-Being in Humanitarian Action
Child Protection in Emergencies Situation and Response Monitoring Toolkit
Summary: Review on Child Wellbeing in Humanitarian Action: Concepts, Definitions and Domains
Webinars
Webinar | Enhancing Parenting Practices in Humanitarian Settings: Evidence and Strategies
Webinar | Harnessing AI and Secondary Data for Smarter Child Protection in Humanitarian Contexts
Webinar | Strategic Advocacy and Funding in CPHA: Leveraging Data and Evidence for Success
Webinar | Capturing Voices: Evidence Generation for CAAFAG